nothing is written

thoughts and more from craig borlase

this christmas

leave a comment »

Like second albums and last goodbyes, it’s the first Christmas after the death of a loved one that is supposed to be the hardest. It’s kind of obvious, I suppose. But it’s not my experience so far. With the tree still up and the recycling bin still ridiculously overfed on paper and plastic, I’m not so sure I can agree. This Christmas has not been the horror that it was meant to be. In fact, I’m wondering if it might just have been the best yet.

I’m not so sure that I was dreading it, but a couple of months back I was certainly anticipating a difficult Christmas this year. Other people knew it, too; all those cards that mentioned how the sender would be ‘thinking of us especially’ helped with the feelings of being on the verge of something potentially difficult. They were appreciated. Like loved ones waving from the crowd at the start of a long race.

I need to pause and digress for a moment. We moved into our house a couple of years ago, and what with it being one of those Victorian homes with high ceilings and just enough period features to go around it’s always struck us as having significant Christmas potential. So we were disappointed when we found out that the fireplace in the front room might have looked good, but the blocked and stunted chimney above the roof meant that it was unusable.

Anyway, this autumn we finally got it all fixed up, and we’ve been spending the last few weeks sitting, staring and feeling the warmth from the fires contained within its black iron walls.

And this has been the metaphor of choice; unblocked, built up and allowed to radiate warmth and light, our year has ended far better than I had feared it would.

Why? I’ve been unsure ever since the heavy snows failed to arrive on time. Thinking now, I’m wondering if the answer is far more simple that I might otherwise suspect; Christmas feels good this year because it’s far, far simpler. Last year, with its midnight phone calls and dark conversations with compassionate nurses, was far harder for the obvious reason that we knew it would be our last with my mother. It was a ritual that we had to get through, a game we had to play while pretending that it was like any of the other 63 Christmases that she had experienced on earth. We did presents and thank you cards and our Christmas eve rituals, and they tasted as bleak and as stale as the last meal served to the condemned man. Nothing was going to change what followed it, but still we had to pretend that everything was just as it should be.

This year has been different. There have been recollections and reminiscences, but the natural gravity of the time has been allowed to win out. So the excitement of the children has been heard the loudest, the future use of the presents has not been packaged up with such sorrow and fear, and the slow burn of the coals has left me feeling warm, not wondering how long it would take to cremate a body.

So, it’s been better. I got a wind-up dynamo keyring torch and it’s yet another metaphor for the way that somehow the resources I have needed this year are within me. The stirring and the winding needs to take place to bring them out, but there’s been just enough of both to see me through and out towards the end of a year in which death became a constant theme.

Written by craig

December 31, 2008 at 2:29 pm

Posted in new normals

another me

leave a comment »

label_image_472 I don’t know whether it started with death or not, but there’s every chance that it did. Somewhere this year I started thinking about the future, the past and just about everything else in between. This book outlined the science of beating death, and somewhere among the pages there’s a point he makes that has squatted in my brain ever since I first heard it; that if we can get around the problem of cell degradation (not such a ridiculous proposal after all, so the author suggests) then our thousand-year lifespans will turn up something extra intriguing. Just as we cannot fully recall what we were like as an infant, so will we at age 387 struggle to remember the person we were at 126. In that way we will become a series of people during our epic lifetimes, not just one.

Which brings me round to a reflection I had with a friend on Monday night. We were reminiscing about the Acid Jazz days - the phase that lasted the first half of the 90s. There we were, middle class, British and white and channeling the urban American black pimp for all we were worth. Being a lanky, long haired type I opted for brown suede safari jacket, 2 inch heeled hand crafted Romanian boots (which were impossible to dance in, but good for drug smuggling) and a viscose bowling/barbeque top that left me both drenched in sweat and severely restricted around the lung area. I looked, as you can guess, fantastic. Or, as one old schoolfriend who saw me dressed up one day en-route to see Primal Scream support Norman Jay at the Brixton Academy in Easter 1992, like a complete tosser.

The whole routine was based on the secret that we all shared; none of us were black, all of us wanted to be black, and if someone who was genuinely black turned up to one of our functions he would be greeted like a returning Spartan war hero, particularly if he had some new dance moves that we could copy and adopt like the rest of the second hand items we wore. Of course, if it turned out that the guy was unimpressed by our attempts to revere his cultural roots running numbers in Brooklyn during the mid 70s, then we’d just shrink a little like busted children.

So that was another me. I don’t recognize the person that was so captivated by the idea of being exclusive, and I’m not sure I remember quite why I thought I wanted to adopt an entirely new identity in the first place. It was only fifteen years ago, but it was seems now like a different me entirely.

If we met now, I wonder what I’d say. I’d probably just play it safe, compliment the boots and move on. It’s probably all that the other me could cope with.

Written by craig

December 18, 2008 at 10:59 am

faith and healing

with one comment

Mark 5:21-43

A Good Story
What should we be making of this? Surely a good story, with effective elements included: suspense, dramatic tension as we are yanked from Jairus, made aware of the crush around Jesus preventing him from moving on to heal the innocent 12 year old girl. We might even share the sense of possible frustration that might be hinted at with Jesus when he has to stop and ask who touched him.

The second story then begins to reveal itself; a woman despised, unclean, used perhaps to making herself invisible. Her healing is instant and linked – we are told very clearly - to her faith; ‘If I could just…’ The touch – and are we therefore to assume, the healing - is the first thing that happens between her and Jesus – she grabs hold of his cloak and he heals her, almost involuntarily. The questions come later – his probing of her reasons, which strikes me as possibly a little strange; surely he knew this already? If Jesus is fully God, then why would he need to question who touched him?

We are then pulled back to the original story with the news that all this good stuff has had a negative consequence; the delay has killed the little girl. The finale is set up perfectly; fake, plastic mourners – the sort whose wailing turns to scornful laughter at a moment’s notice – a quietened room, a handful of witnesses and the words of a loving father that breathe life where death has threatened to settle.

A Good One… But Potentially Toxic
It’s a good story. It’s made for TV. And I think it has probably been the cause of pain, distress and abuse. How come?

[32] But Jesus kept looking around to see who had done it. Then the woman, knowing what had happened to her, came and fell at his feet and, trembling with fear, told him the whole truth. He said to her, “Daughter, your faith has healed you. Go in peace and be freed from your suffering.”

How great would it be to be alive here today with the sure-fire knowledge that our faith could heal us. How much silence do we need to compile a list in our minds of the things we’d choose have healed, fixed or just touched by the hand of God if we could?

If releasing healing itself it was only a matter of believing that God could do it I’d be waltzing around healing, helping and transforming lives in a way that would make Cinderella’s Fairy Godmother look like a self-cantered slacker. The only problem would be which destination first; the hospice, the African refugee camps or right here, in this town, in this church?

If only it were a matter of believing enough to reach out and grab hold of Christ… wouldn’t our lives look different?

Life’s Not Like That
Why is life not like this? Do we lack even the mustard seed amount required to see God work miracles? Is it our fault? Have we messed up? Were there other people in the crowd wanting to be healed, but lacking the courage, belief or conviction to ask Jesus for themselves? Is that who we are – the ones that Jesus walked by? The ones he ignored?

I apologise now for what I’m going to share. I’m not saying it to manipulate or make you feel uncomfortable. I’m saying it because I cannot talk about faith and healing without looking back on a year scarred by grief.

The last time I spoke here I mentioned that things were about to get tough. Here’s what I said:

If the doctors are correct I might well be attending a few funerals over the coming years. My step-father last week was told he has months to live as the cancer he was treated for a couple of years ago has returned to his face and lung. He’s talking about his funeral already, wondering whether family rifts will be patched over for the occasion. His life has been a catalogue of failed relationships and I know that sadly, many of those burying him with be dead themselves. I will be left feeling empty and hollow, wondering how different it would all feel I my step-dad or either of his sons had made the choice to follow, to reach and to take part in the journey with God.

My mother is also talking about her own funeral. Her battle with liver cancer looks as though it has longer to play out than my step-dad’s, but she’s aware that the end is a little closer for her than she thought. “I want my funeral to be a celebration” she says. I don’t know quite how well this will help us grieve, but I get her point: there’s something about having lived a life that followed Jesus that transforms the way we approach the rituals surrounding death. Death, it seems, is not the worst thing that can happen to us. Funerals too, are not the best.

It turns out I was wrong. It wasn’t years, it was months and there weren’t two but three funerals. Four if you count our next door neighbour and six if you count the two frozen guinea pigs we buried on Wednesday.

Mothers
Both my and Emma’s mother were women of faith. They had known unbelief and the glorious power of Christ’s redemption. Both found that in the midst of their deepest suffering – when they were young women, younger than I am today – God was there. Faith grew within them as they picked their way out of their own valleys of the shadow of death; for my mother it was the fear of being utterly overwhelmed when first facing life as a single mother. For Emma’s mum it was the grief of losing both her parents within the first few years of her marriage.

Despite the pain that drew them to take their first steps of faith, they both grew to become remarkable women. Women who found that their faith was the fuel to propel them out. They set up and ran charities, dedicated themselves to helping outcasts and underdogs and chased after God with incredible persistence and amazing results. My mum would spend hours sitting and immersing herself in scripture, scribbling notes and messages for others in her bible as certain passages jumped out. Emma’s mum would suck every last molecule of spiritual protein from the books she read, always ready to share her newly acquired knowledge over kitchen table tea.

So these women had faith. The believed that God could do amazing things – and they had the privilege of seeing such things at first hand, and in their own lives.

So, they had faith.

And they had cancer.

So they prayed for healing.

And yet they died.

Why?
I know this passage was on my mum’s mind towards the end. For the final year she would chime out the phrase:

‘one touch of the King changes everything’.

Emma’s mum likewise talked about taking pleasure in being in a place where the only chance of a prolonged future was if a divine miracle showed up. ‘Wouldn’t that be great?’ she’d ask. ‘Such a sign of God’s power to confound the sceptics.’

As the realisation of death’s imminence gradually settled on both of them, they struggled. Life – shortening by the week – got hard. Why were they not healed? Was it their fault? Did they lack faith? Why would God choose to take them away so early when there were so many unborn grandchildren yet to be held, so many people yet to help, so much life left unlived. Why, when they reached out again and again, did nothing happen?

Of course, there were other parts of their brain that knew otherwise. They knew that physical healings are rare for us, they knew that God’s ways are above and beyond our understanding, they knew they could trust him, and eventually they knew it was time to go.

But not before their faith had been stripped down, blow-torched, threshed, flailed and flogged. For women who had been living examples of strength, bravery and determination, they were left eerily silent, childlike with their lack of answers to what was going on. Like the bleeding woman in the story, part of them was left face down at Jesus’ feet. Fearful? Perhaps. Confused? At times. Angry? I never heard them say it, but who would blame them? Not God, I suspect. We shield far too often from our anger…

Guilt, anger, disbelief, frustration, disappointment – are these the legacies of our prayers to God? They may not define us completely – I certainly hope not – but are there traces that could be found within us if we looked close enough?

Why Does This Happen?
Why is that for every miraculous instance of healing and transformative encounter, there are many, many more where prayers for healing and restoration go unanswered? Why are there so many seemingly unanswered prayers littering our lives like cold-war satellites. Remember that quote at the start? Is that what our life is like; surrounded by the debris of unanswered prayer? Each fragment may not be much more than a spec, but given time and the continued repeats of our faith feeling not quite up to the task, do we end up obscured, bogged down or clogged up?

But the truth that I wonder about is this: it’s not doubt that is the main barrier to divine healing. It’s God.

If I’m wrong – if it is faith alone that heals us, if it’s just about the quality – or quantity – of our prayers, then we’re into a very weird situation indeed. And God is not a slot machine any more than our prayers are the coins we pile into them.

For some, this is where the talk ends. We just need to acknowledge the disappointment, anger or disbelief that has settled within us since we told ourselves that God let us down.

For others, we might need more – an explanation, perhaps. A reason why. I don’t really know. I know what I’m supposed to say; that God’s ways are not ours, that it’s his grace that heals us, that our faith does matter – it drives us towards God, which matters more than the physical condition we’re in. Maybe we should follow James’ advice and:

‘Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds, 3because you know that the testing of your faith develops perseverance.’

Back To The Story
Apparently NT Wright reads his New Testament straight from the Greek. His own translation of the lines “If I just touch his clothes, I will be healed” and “My little daughter is dying. Please come and put your hands on her so that she will be healed and live.” Differ:

If I just touch his clothes I will be SAVED

Come and SAVE my daughter.

He writes about what salvation really means – how it includes elements of present, physical things like healing and rescues – not just what happens to us after we die.

So when Jesus heals he’s not just handing out goodies or extra treats for the ones he notices or who should loud enough He’s bringing to the here and now elements of God’s salvation of his people.

When we pray for healing, are we perhaps thinking too small? Should we rather pray for salvation – or more of it? I’m not sure, but I know I want to find out more about that one.

One Last Thing
In a book recently I read something that made me stop. It was the line about how Moses asked God to let him be seen. God declined, saying that it was not possible. However, he’d allow him to see ‘his back’. Is that right? Can God really have a back? If so, does he have a top, a bottom and a front? Surely not – surely he can’t be limited, hemmed in or tailored?

Here’s what the book has to say:

‘The Hebrew word for ‘my back’ is achorai…. The word achor also has a temporal sense. What God seems to be saying to Moses is that you can see ‘my afterward’. You can see just what it’s like after I’ve been here. But if you knew what it was like while I was still there, that would mean you were still hanging on to a little piece of your self-awareness that was telling you it was you who was there. And that would also mean there was a part of your consciousness detached and watching the whole thing and therefore not all of you was there. There are, in other words, simply some things in life that demand such total self absorption that you cannot know it’s you who is there until it’s over. Being in the presence of God is such an experience.’

I don’t know fully why this helps, but it reminds me of something I experienced frequently this year – the sense that I was very, very small, peeking behind the curtain backstage at a grand theatrical production. I don’t know what’s going on or where I fit in, but I’m glimpsing things that I shouldn’t really be seeing.

Death is connected to life. There’s sorrow and loss and loneliness as well, but there’s a sense of being connected to God that is very, very powerful. In a way All this death makes faith easy. It makes life bigger and bolder and the colours and the tastes better than ever. It’s easy to trust God when not trusting him means losing everything. Being so fully in the moment with God is the key.

What’s hard is coming back down to earth. Finding yourself out on the edge of the crowd, a spectator in your own faith, watching- detached – as others get closer but you do not. That’s when it’s tempting to let faith become a formula – the right sort or quantity of prayers being the way to get the result. But like the woman forcing her way forward, ignoring the pain from within her body and the elbows or ankles from the others crushing forward, she existed at that moment for no other reason than to connect with God.

I suppose that’s what true faith is. And surely that is the way to be truly saved.

Written by craig

December 4, 2008 at 9:04 am

Posted in grieving

it turns out that yes, you can.

with 3 comments

Even down to the presence of death and grief in the campaign’s final hours, this election stayed close to the script that started out in the brilliant mind of Aaron Sorkin. The coming days will more than likely see the two plots continue to twin, with a high-ranking Republican being announced for Secretary of State.

But the closest link in my mind comes from the mouth of Bartlett, not Santos.

What’s next?

What’s next for America? Will you navigate the chaos of two wars, a recession and a freshly-legitimised minority now finally finding a voice? If we can guess anything, sorely it is that the past two years that have bruised Obama are nothing compared to what follows.

What’s next for the rest of us who - noses smearing the screen - have hoped that you Americans would take such a giant leap forward as this? Will we get over ourselves and allow you out of the box? Will we allow you to become something other than the cliche of hefty buttocks and narrowed perception? Will we let you lead?

Lead? Isn’t the era of the American Superpower over? No way. There’s a reason that we’ve all been captivated by the election, and that’s because - however begrudgingly - we in the rest of the world still look upon the US as the best candidate for superpower number one. Four more years of a Republican White House might have brought that to an end, but maybe, just maybe, there’s life in the old dog yet.

I was talking with a friend today about how the split Christian vote was a sign of real health. When either party secures the God Vote it surely can’t be good. Perhaps Christians disagreeing with each other isn’t so bad after all.

Written by craig

November 5, 2008 at 4:40 pm

Posted in new normals

which way is up?

with one comment

I’ve read two different versions of the same statistic in the last week. It seems that these days everyone’s looking for a yard stick against which to measure the state of the spluttering economy. One of the measurements in fashion right now is this; the ratio of household debt to GDP.

If, like me, you virtually flunked your economics and have a little difficulty telling your macro from your micro, some explanation is in order. Household debt to GDP (Gross Domestic Product – a fancy title for the effective income of any given country) simply shows how much on average households are borrowing against what the whole country has coming in.

Last summer, according to some reports, the UK broke through an invisible – but significant – barrier; we started borrowing more than we were earning.

A few months later and the whole thing has gone crazy. We’re now in a situation where the world’s ‘wealthiest’ countries are caught up in the chains of debt, as the stats reveal:

Household debt as a percentage of GDP

(2005)

France 56.2%
United States 98%
United Kingdom 104.2%
Netherlands 116.5%

Another, more up to date, version put the UK in overall lead, with about household debt now at over 170% of GDP.

Yikes.

Here are a few more shockers for you…

The freshly-bailed out Royal Bank of Scotland’s liabilities alone exceed the total national income of the U.K. So far this year UK debt has grown at a rate of £1million every 8.5 minutes. The current rate of 104 house repossessions every day is sure to rise as is the fact that 1 person every 5 minutes is declared bankrupt.

There are  a couple of questions that line up behind this; what does all this debt say about us? And what’s all this credit crunching going to do to our new-found passion to change the world and eliminate poverty?

We’ve all heard greed blamed as the number one fuel for the current financial crisis. But I doubt it’s really as simple as that. Why? Because – as I found out when I opened the results envelope and saw a shiny ‘D’ next to A level Economics - nothing ever really is that simple. Yet what we can be sure of is the fact that the current threat of Depression 2.0 tells us this; we really ought to be a little more sceptical of the hype that we pump out here in the wealthy west. All our strutting and strolling and summiteering (Ok, I just made that up, but you get the drift) is worth far les than we assume. We think of ourselves as the global leaders and yet we can’t even manage our own interests properly, let alone deal with the fact that 2 out of 3 people on this planet will be forced to try and get through the next 24 hours on less than £1.

Right now, if you ask me, we look a lot less like global leaders and a lot more like the prodigals taking our first look at the pig-sty which pretty soon could become our home.

But what about the other question; is this the end of our brief attempts to be the first generation in a while that makes real efforts to correct the problem of global injustice? Are we going to be too busy licking our own wounds over the coming years to worry about anyone else’s? Has charity got to go back to basics and start over again at home?

Opinions, please.

Written by craig

October 20, 2008 at 1:34 pm

Posted in new normals

the end of life as we know it?

with one comment

Now, I like this guy called Steve Strang. Personally, I find him to be pretty good company. Of course there’s plenty that we would disagree on, but I get the feeling that had he been born in Mumbai and found his faith, Steve would have ended up being one of those remarkable influential nobodies that are quietly changing their world.

Oh, he published a book I wrote too, so that makes him a pretty rare man.

But Steve wasn’t born in Mumbai, and he’s become - for what it’s worth - the kind of guy that features in Time magazine’s list of the Most Influential Evangelicals in America.

And this is his latest blog posting:

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Life As We Know It Will End If Obama Is Elected

I was amazed that during the presidential debate this week Sen. John McCain didn’t make the point that if Sen. Barack Obama is elected, life as we know it in many ways will end. America will be more socialized and have less free enterprise and freedom.

It seems that due to the current economic crisis, a percentage of Americans are clamoring for change in the White House. Unfortunately, they don’t seem to realize that change will mean gay rights will be encoded into law and abortion rights laws will be strengthened. The result will be an alteration in our entire social structure and the likelihood that Roe v. Wade—the case that led to the legalization of abortion–will never be overturned. Recently someone sent me a video put out by Roman Catholics on the sanctity of life. Take time to watch it at www.catholicvote.com. It makes the point that protecting human life from conception to natural death is one of the most important responsibilities we have as Christians.

I believe if Obama is elected, the government will tax, tax, tax the citizens who are most productive. Yet it’s been proven that tax increases lead to economic downturn, while tax cuts lead to economic growth (which we desperately need). There will also be a “take from the rich, give to the poor” type of socialistic mind-set throughout the nation. And I believe our country will be weaker militarily around the world.

In addition, people who hate Christianity will be emboldened to attack our freedoms. Christianity is already persona non grata in academia and in the liberal media. People such as Bill Maher and Michael Moore, who hate God and God’s people, will think the election verifies that the nation as a whole believes as they do and will jump for glee. Meanwhile, Christians seem almost asleep. There is no outcry! And there is a group of Bible-believing Christians who appear to have decided to overlook how dangerous Obama will be and plan to vote for him anyway.

A few weeks ago McCain and Obama were even in the polls. However, the economic crisis seems to have pushed some Americans toward Obama. So in the 25 days to the election we must pray as never before. And we must work to wake up Christians. That is what happened late in the 2004 election—Christian leaders rallied believers, and as a result, George W. Bush was re-elected president.

Even though polls are often right, there are exceptions, and we must pray and work–before it’s too late–to see that Obama is not elected. I receive lots of interesting e-mails having to do with the election and the issues surrounding current culture wars. Below is some of what someone sent me and urged me to pass on. There are links to several interesting videos that you should take the time to watch. Much of what you will see is disturbing. I urge you to forward the information below to your friends.

The only reason Obama is competitive is because people do not really know who and what he stands for.

Barack Obama’s Views:

Endorsed by:
- ACLU
- AFL-CIO
- National Trial Lawyers Groups
- NARAL
- Planned Parenthood
- Homosexual and atheist advocacy groups
- Moveon.org
- Radical leftist national groups

These groups have provided the largest support for his campaign, along with the Saudis. And every one of them hates serious Christians and Zionist Jews. How can a Christian or a Jew vote with them? He promised the trial lawyers that he will fight against Tort Reform.

He promised the unions to vote for the Union Intimidation Act (aka Employee Free Choice Act)–a laughable name for legislation that will devastate American jobs. He promised the abortionists to vote for the Abortion Anytime Act (aka the Freedom of Choice Act).

He promised the homosexuals that he will support the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act, and he is already fighting the California Marriage Amendment. And he has no experience! Hello?

Serious Political Videos and Articles that Expose the Truth about Barack Obama

Article: See Obama’s Illegal Campaign Contributions
http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html?s=al&promo_code=6BD9-1

Video Clip: Mohammar Khaddafi on Barack Obama. Quite real and quite damning.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSemkPChvHo

Video Clip: A History of Barack Obama’s Life and Politics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUdjhKbImwE

Video Clip: Barack Obama on Defense Spending
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sj91NH5fvw

Video Clip: Little-Known Barack Obama Scandals
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sawN7uJ8s8s

Video Clip: Hillary Shreds Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQadAAlK9c4

Video Clip: Biden Slams Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV14xqelWxY

Video Clip: The Hypocrisy of the Liberal Media Exposed in Their Attack on Sarah Palin’s Prayer for the Troops
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hpwM4Jjyrs

Video Clip: School Children Sing Praises of Obama
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08iomNFrzU4


I know many of you are as disturbed as I am. I think this information on Obama speaks for itself. Let’s pray for a shift in our country. And let’s get this information into the hands of as many people as possible. If you missed my endorsement of John McCain, click here.

And be sure to add your thoughts to the blog.


Perhaps it shouldn’t be surprising that his tone and pitch have revved up just like McCain’s, but I have to confess that I was a little taken aback by this. But what made me smile were the comments that followed. Read them for yourself here.

What I want to know is are these the final kicks and snarls of a fatally wounded beast - is this the beginning of the end of the religious right? Or is this the first signs of a drastic counter attack that will lead us into the kind of future that Atwood glimpsed in The Handmaid’s Tale?

Written by craig

October 10, 2008 at 7:59 am

not so great

leave a comment »

This is plagiarism, but since I can’t remember whether or where or when I read, heard or overheard someone saying this I’ll just have to go ahead and spew it;

In years that followed it  the 1914-1918 war was the seen as one of the most brutal periods of human history. It was the war to end all wars, the like of which nobody assumed would be seen again. So they called it the Great War.

1939 - 1945 changed all that. With over 70 million dead on both sides the Great War was no longer so unique and as a result it was renamed World War I.

There was another event that shaped the twentieth century; the Great Depression. From 1929 to the 30s and 40s, the largest and most significant economic depression devastated the economies of once-wealthy nations. The cause? The 1929 stock market crash.

It doesn’t take a genius to see where this is heading; could it be that soon we’ll be forced into rebranding the Great Depression? Are about to start GD II?

Whether this happens or not, what we call it is surely the least significant part of it all. But I’m wondering if, right now, tinkering with the packaging is about all we can do.

Written by craig

October 2, 2008 at 4:16 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

a thought in my head this trip

leave a comment »

Where to start.

There was the flight over here. I was near the toilet and it was not so pleasant. And then I saw some actress whose name I constantly forget – Scarlett Johanson, that’s it. She was quite short. Then there was fact that I trusted the Sat Nav to help me avoid traffic congestion. It did, steering me away from the string of red lights and into the darkness of the Los Angeles gangland suburbs.

But none of that really helps as a diving board for a description of this trip. This, however, is a better place to start; a transcription of a meeting between the best President the US never had and the next one it might end up with. Aaron Sorkin’s a genius, and Jed’s on top form:

BARACK OBAMA knocks on the front door of a 300-year-old New Hampshire farmhouse while his Secret Service detail waits in the driveway. The door opens and OBAMA is standing face to face with former President JED BARTLET.

BARTLET Senator.


OBAMA Mr. President.


BARTLET You seem startled.


OBAMA I didn’t expect you to answer the door yourself.


BARTLET I didn’t expect you to be getting beat by John McCain and a Lancôme rep who thinks “The Flintstones” was based on a true story, so let’s call it even.


There have been many words written already about the links between the build up to this current election and the one played out by the characters of Santos and Vinick in the final season of The West Wing.

If you want the introductory guide then read the BBC’s exploration here. If you’re already familiar then the following should make sense;

Vinick’s assertion that nuclear power is safe just ahead of a serious accident at a Californian nuclear power plant

Vs.

McCain’s ‘the fundamentals of the economy are strong’

Or how about old Jed engaging his troops in an armed conflict between China and Russia – a decision that would have massive financial implications for whoever become the next President…

Vs.

$700 billion

Even the will he/won’t he show up at the first debate joins the dots between McCain and Vinick, who’s erratic behaviour in the final weeks of the campaign left the Democrats struggling to comprehend their motives and control the debate.

Anyway, those links being what they are, the point of it all is this; what happens next? Hopefully the imitation of art by life stops soon and neither of the VPs suffers like Leo McGarry with a fatal heart attack. But could it be that this election will go the same way? It’s clearly a close one.

The way I see it, Sorkin got it right; Obama wins. I’m basing my prediction on nothing more than almost completely insubstantial and anecdotal evidence. But, hey, isn’t that what blogs are all about?

So, from the swirling remnants at the bottom of my teacup I see the following as signs of things to come;

The religious right are split. Stephen Mansfield’s ‘The Faith of Barrack Obama’ is not the sarcastic savaging that you might expect from the man who gushed his way through ‘The Faith of George W Bush’. And while most of the usual suspects are breaking right for McCain, churchgoers appear unwilling to deliver themselves as a block for the GOP.

Oh, and I’ve yet to meet an Evangelical Christian on this trip who’s saying that they’re voting for McCain.

There are probably a whole load more spurious reasons I could come up with, but the point is this conclusion; if Obama does win then it will be a gigantic tick in the box for optimism. Change sits well with Obama’s race but do mavericks really keep going in their seventies? No, if Obama wins it will be because more people in the country are fueled by a belief that the future is worth investing in.

For the moment we Europeans have lost faith in this kind of hope. That last century was the final nail after the previous wind down of our time as individual superpowers. Yet here in the US – with its audacious crashes and even more outrageous rescue plans – the belief that things can and should improve is strong. The country is still young enough for cynicism yet to have choked it, and now old enough to tackle some of the problems that are crying out for its attention.

Love him or loathe him, but President Bush has done well in his fight against the crushing weight of global poverty Africa is a better place because of his place of work these last eight years.

Another eight years on from now, and it’s worth wondering just how much further the message of change could have spread.

Written by craig

September 26, 2008 at 6:27 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

i have something to say that’s not about death!

with 3 comments

Eight months with my head out of the loop and I finally wake up to a double portion of shame, betrayal and intrigue.

First up, Todd Bentley – the guy with all the tattoos and tv interest – has left his wife. One minute he was being heralded as the edgy, awkward deliverer of the very latest brand of God-Soaked Things. The next, he’s been far too edgy and awkward and left people are left wondering whether it was all a fraud.

Not so much need for the wondering with Mike Guglielmucci. The guy wrote a song – ‘healer’ – and added to his creation by letting people know that he was suffering from terminal cancer. It turns out, however, he hasn’t and never did suffer from cancer – just a sixteen-year addiction to porn.

Our Healer! all the more..., Mike or Michael Guglielmucci, writer of HEALER

Of course many are responding with shock and disappointment, and words like betrayal and fraud are never far from the screen. God TV – the station that appeared to do all that it could to promote the meetings in Florida that Bentley hosted – now has little to say on the subject, let alone show. I heard that ‘healer’ has suffered a similar punishment, having been quickly yanked from YouTube as well as various forthcoming live albums; how – the logic goes – can people sing the song knowing such lies have been woven into it?

I don’t know what I think about Bentley. I mean, I know what I think – I wrote about those thoughts a while back – but the sad news that his life is so obviously in some kind of free-fall does not really change how I feel. If anything it makes the fault lines even clearer; yet again the Church has missed the point and got blinded by the lights, pumped up by the sugar rush of something that seems New and Exciting. We wanted Bentley to have caught hold of something truly dramatic, radical and utterly transformative – something that would change our world as we know it. And because we wanted it all so desperately I can only assume that he fell into the same trap of so many others, where delivering on expectation eventually became more important than pursuing personal integrity.

We wanted the glitz and the excitement, and in a way, I suppose that’s exactly what we got. And if there’s any shame in the story I think it belongs to us, who forced our heads into the trough and gorged on the assumption that transformation, drama and radical experience could be found simply by turning up to a meeting or flicking a tv remote. We want change? Well, it comes through us, not to us. We want something that could change the world? What more do we need than the ancient and eternal truths that bind our faith together?

When it comes to Guglielmucci and his lies, I feel sad. I feel sad that he treated cancer as a dressing-up box accompaniment, a tool for advancing his art. Life deserves more respect than that. It is clear that his own freefall has been going on for some time, and it saddens me that secrets and lies lasted well into their second decade. I feel sad that he felt the need to develop a good story to help promote the song. But none of it surprises me.

I suppose I feel more sad about the reactions of others. The way I see it, the background to the song is now utterly different, but the lyrics remain just as true as they have over the millennia. Surely now, at last, Guglielmucci can sing those words out loud without having to shield the deceit? Why, then, can’t we? Doesn’t he need us to sing for him more than ever? Doesn’t the song now have far more authenticity that we know the truth behind it? Isn’t it now finally about God alone, rather than a terribly human attempt to create something to impress the congregations?

So I don’t see why Hillsong has yanked footage of Guglielmucci speaking at one of their events with an oxygen tube strapped across his face like a misplaced smile. I don’t see why this song must be buried without trace. If the work of fallen songsmiths should disappear then where does that leave us with the Psalms? By extension, what do we do with Martin Luther King’s words? Do any of us make the grade?

What I do see is that yet again this fall exposes our own failings. Once more we missed the point and made the story about us rather than God. We  got seduced by the hype and got lost in the crowd.

It will happen again, I suppose. These wanderings off course have a familiar feel to them. But we really ought to know better. And if we continue to pursue excitement and frills and easy-answers to complex questions, if we reduce our part in the faith to hopping on a plane or singing a sing with enough passion, then the world will rot on our watch as this bride of Christ flirts with the wedding guests.

Written by craig

August 27, 2008 at 9:52 am

i’m a bundle of laughs these days

with one comment

I turned up to a meeting last Friday and got chatting with one of the guys. We exchanged a few bits of chat and then he said that he’d had a look at this blog before he came out to the meeting. He commented on the fact that I don’t seem to be holding much back.

I’ve wondered about it for a few days. Self-absorption? Perhaps. Stuck in a creative rut? Possibly. But the only real point I can make with any certainty is that these pages are here act like some kind of skimming pool filter; whatever’s up on the surface will make its way out. That’s not to say that there isn’t other stuff deeper down, but these little bobbins are the ones that just seem to keep on coming back out.

Pain is loneliness.

I’ve been wondering why this seems so true of late - why is it that with a wife of 11 years, 3 kids, numerous friends within a five minute walk of here and plenty of scattered soul-mates across several countries  I still feel a profound sense of loneliness these days?

There’s a feeling I have that has become familiar of late. It’s more geographical than emotional, as if it’s some kind of second-hand deja-vu I’ve mysteriously inherited. To the side and behind me is fog, the kind that is saturated with rain that defies the laws and hangs in the air, refusing to fall. I think there may be people nearby – or there may have been. Perhaps I’ve been walking with them, but since I cannot hear, see or touch them they don’t feature too heavily in the scene.

I know that I have travelled some distance and gained some altitude to get to this place; my body feels a little tired, yet excited by the fact that it is working well enough to get me this far. But as I stand here – wherever here happens to be – something becomes clear; all that has gone on before is just the beginning. Ahead of me lies nothing more than a mile-high mass of fogged-out emptiness across which I must travel. Alone.

This is the sense I have so often, that recent times have taken me on some kind of mini-epic journey, forcing me to climb higher than ever before – so high I don’t even have to look down to know how precarious this position has become; the sense of risk is all around. Six months on since the first funeral of the three and there have been clear signs that this initial phase is drawing to a close. Days of suffocating tears have long gone, as have the moments of feeling utterly allergic to the toxic shock of Normal Life. I have been able to work, to write, to laugh and reacquaint myself with the new normal.

But this feeling – this sense of the months having only just been an introduction – this is something new and at times overwhelming. The sheer length of time ahead feels like too much

Last night a friend talked to me about the ‘ancientness of sorrow’. He said that loss connects us with something bigger, something timeless, something that to some extent we have to shoulder on our own. I’m wondering how many characters - Biblical and otherwise - fit the mold: David, Job, Jesus, Jonah, Paul, Lear. The list could be long.

I have to stop now, before I find myself putting on old Cure albums at an unreasonable volume.

Written by craig

August 26, 2008 at 3:53 pm

Posted in grieving